Sob o sol do dasein

a descoberta do ser-aí na teologia da esperança

Abstract

From the analysis of Martin Heidegger's conceptions about the hermeneutics of facticity, it is possible to perceive a convergence between the hermeneutics of facticity and Jürgen Moltmann's theology of hope, with regard to the existential meaning of hope in the midst of the experience of human suffering. . In this sense, it is important to understand what the being-there is in Moltman's theology of hope. This article aims to analyze the perspectives of Jürgen Moltmann and Martin Heidegger on the theology of hope and the hermeneutics of facticity, with the aim of understanding the ontological meaning of hope. To do this, it will be necessary to briefly describe Heidegger's hermeneutics of facticity, his main contributions to the philosophy and theology of hope, particularly being-there as being-in-the-world. Present the theology of hope and the personal trajectory of its author, Jürgen Moltmann, as well as the concrete experience of captivity as a prisoner of war and hope resulting from experiences of suffering. Analyze the influence of the philosopher Ersnt Bloch on the construction of the theology of hope and the convergence with the hermeneutics proposed by Heidegger. Finally, explore, based on the ontological meaning proposed by Heidegger, the path from hope to dasein in a world increasingly sensitive to human contradictions. Understanding how human anguish also fosters hope contributes to promoting dialogue on seemingly antagonistic aspects of human life, such as the experience of persecution and freedom, hunger and abundance, death and life. Research can highlight how the ideas of Heidegger and Moltmann can contribute to this. The interaction between philosophy and theology in these discussions promotes a rich interdisciplinary dialogue, which can offer new perspectives on age-old questions related to hope and human suffering. Heidegger and Moltmann are prominent figures in their respective fields, and exploring their ideas about hope and dasein can contribute significantly to contemporary theology and philosophy, especially with regard to critical experiences that make man suffer and question their meaning. At a time when societies are increasingly subject to suffering as a result of countless causes, economic, political and social, understanding Heidegger and Moltmann's thinking for a hermeneutics of hope can offer ways to overcome problems and foster not only hope , but the ways to understand the meaning of the suffering man's existence, beyond the experience of suffering. The analysis of the views of Moltmann and Heidegger will reveal that their approaches towards anguish and hope are convergent, both offering complementary perspectives that can contribute to the existential understanding of the theology of hope. While Heidegger proposes an unprecedented form of understanding attentive to the existential meaning of being inserted in the world, Moltmann highlights the intrinsic value of suffering and religious tradition as essential components for promoting hope. This complementarity can offer a richer and more inclusive basis for dialogue and social cohesion in contemporary societies.