Truly rural? Urban and rural characters of Czech first names as perceived by inhabitants of the Moravian-Silesian Region

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48075/odal.v7i1.36638

Keywords:

name perception, rural areas, urban areas, onomastic knowledge, quantitative onomastics

Abstract

This article aims to investigate whether a set of Czech first names is perceived as typical of urban or rural areas by inhabitants of the Moravian-Silesian Region, a distinctive post-industrial area located in the Czech Republic borderlands. It seeks to understand whether this perception is consistent with official census data or influenced by stereotypes and personal experiences. The research draws on the notion of onomastic knowledge (Seide, 2021a; 2021b), which posits that a speaker’s knowledge about personal names is built through experiences, beliefs, and memories, and may diverge from scientific knowledge based on official census data. To this end, an online questionnaire was developed and distributed via Microsoft Forms. It contained a list of names (18 male and 25 female names), each of which accompanied with a Likert scale with the alternatives “city,” “village,” and “neutral,” for the respondents to report their perceptions about each name. The names were selected through a complex four-stage, statistically informed procedure. The responses provided by 127 participants were analysed, most of them women (69%) and aged 21–30 years old (55%). The findings show that respondents’ perceptions and census data converge for 44% of the female names and 50% of the male names. While such a convergence indicates that the speakers’ onomastic knowledge may relate to actual data, the divergence points to the influence of stereotypes, such as the association of traditional or religious names with rural areas. This study is expected to inspire researchers to carry out further investigations on the subject and possibly help future parents make informed choices of names based on their social and cultural aspects

References

Bobbit, Z. (2024). How to interpret Cramér’s V. Statology. https://www.statology.org/interpret-cramers-v/.

Březinová, K. (2021). Současná česká antroponymie a její vnímání uživateli jazyka [Contemporary Czech anthroponymy and its perception by language users]. Ostrava [master’s thesis, University of Ostrava, Faculty of Arts, Department of Czech Language].

Březinová, K. (2024). Výzkum percepce rodných jmen ve společnosti — jména na venkově a ve městě [Research on the perception of birth names in society — names in rural areas and cities]. Onomastica, 68, 79–99. https://onomastica.ijppan.pl/index.php/ONOM/article/view/507/671.

CSO. Narození (Birth). Czech Statistical Office. (2025). https://csu.gov.cz/narozeni?pocet=10&start=0&podskupiny=133&razeni=-datumVydani [2026-02-27].

Cvrček, V. (2019). Terms: din. Czech National Corpus Handbook. http://wiki.korpus.cz/doku.php?id=pojmy:din&rev=1569573129.

Cvrček, V. (2021). Calc 1.04. Czech National Corpus. https://www.korpus.cz/calc/.

Fernandez Juncal, C. & Seide, M. S. (2021). Convergencia y divergencia de los repertorios antroponímicos brasileño y español. [Convergence and divergence in the Brazilian and Spanish anthroponym repertoires]. Fórum Lingüístico, 18(2), 6101–6123. https://doi.org/10.5007/1984-8412.2021.e73809.

Harvalík, M. & Valentová, I. (2021). Tendencies in the development of contemporary official anthroponymy in Czechia and Slovakia. Onoma, 56, 37–55.

Kaysel Menegaldo, K. (to be published). Sociální aspekty fungování vlastních jmen (na příkladu současné české antroponymie) [Social aspects of the functioning of personal names (based on the example of contemporary Czech anthroponymy)]. Ostrava [dissertation, University of Ostrava, Faculty of Arts, Department of Czech Language].

Knappová, M. (1977). Jazyková kultura a společenské fungování rodných jmen [Language culture and the social functioning of birth names]. Naše řeč, 60(1), 24–30. http://nase-rec.ujc.cas.cz/archiv.php?art=5958.

Knappová, M. (1978). Jak se bude jmenovat? [What Will His/Her Name Be?]. Prague.

Knappová, M. (1978a). Ideologické a sociální aspekty antroponomastiky [Ideological and social aspects of anthroponymy]. Slovo a slovesnost, 39(3–4), 335–337. http://sas.ujc.cas.cz/archiv.php?art=2569.

Knappová, M. (1978b). Sociální podmíněnost volby rodného jména v slovanských jazycích [Social conditioning of the choice of birth name in Slavic languages]. Slavia, 47(3), 225–232.

Knappová, M. (1985). Jak se bude jmenovat? [What Will His/Her Name Be?]. Prague.

Knappová, M. (1989). Rodné jméno v jazyce a společnosti. [The given name in language and society]. Prague.

Knappová, M. (1995). Proměny českého systému rodných jmen [Transformations of the Czech system of given names]. Acta onomastica, 36, 105–109.

Knappová, M. (1996). Jak se bude vaše dítě jmenovat? [What will your child be named?]. Prague.

Knappová, M. (1999). Jak se bude vaše dítě jmenovat? [What will your child be named?]. Prague.

Knappová, M. (2006). Jak se bude vaše dítě jmenovat? [What will your child be named?]. Prague.

Knappová, M. (2010). Jak se bude vaše dítě jmenovat? [What will your child be named?]. Prague.

Knappová, M. (2017). Jak se bude vaše dítě jmenovat? [What will your child be named?]. Prague.

Pleskalová, J. (2011). Vývoj vlastních jmen osobních v českých zemích v letech 1000–2010. [The development of personal names in the Czech Lands from 1000 to 2010]. Brno.

Rodríguez, G. (2020). Los nombres de pila en Alemania como portadores de información social. ¿Cómo se puede codificar la información social en los nombres? [First names in Germany as carriers of social information. How can social information be encoded in names?]. Onomástica desde América Latina, 1(1), 77–99. https://doi.org/10.48075/odal.v1i1.24161.

Scott, M. & Tribble, C. (2006). Textual patterns: Key words and corpus analysis in language education. Amsterdam.

Seide M. S. (2025). Language teaching, hydronyms, and the right to water bodies. Onomastica Uralica, 20, 177–191.

Seide, M. S. (2016a). A identidade religiosa na antroponímia de Marechal Cândido Rondon. [Religious identity in the antroponyms in Marechal Cândido Rondon]. Revista De Estudos Da Linguagem, 24(1), 167–186. https://doi.org/10.17851/2237-2083.24.1.167-186.

Seide, M. S. (2016b). Métodos de pesquisa em Antroponomástica. [Research methods in Anthroponomastics]. Domínios da Lingu@gem, 10(3), 1146–1171. https://doi.org/10.14393/DL23-v10n3a2016-19.

Seide, M. S. (2020). A Antroponomástica Comparada. [Compared Anthroponomastics]. Onomástica desde América Latina, 1(2), 83–102. https://doi.org/10.48075/odal.v1i2.25488.

Seide, M. S. (2021a). Prenomes cristãos: constituição, etimologia, motivação para a escolha antroponímica e conhecimento onomástico. [Christian first names: constitution, etymology, motivation for anthroponymy choice, and onomastic knowledge]. Revista de Estudos da Linguagem, 29(1), 49–76. https://doi.org/10.17851/2237-2083.29.1.49-76.

Seide, M. S. (2021b). Proposal of interdisciplinary definition of proper name. Onomástica desde América Latina, 2(4), 200–222. https://doi.org/10.48075/odal.v2i4.28007.

Šlajsová, M. (1965). Křestní jména v chodských vsích, jak je uvádí berní rula [First names in Chod villages, as recorded in the tax register]. Zpravodaj Místopisné komise ČSAV [The Bulletin of the Onomastic Committee of the Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences], 7(4), 58.

Šmilauer, V. (1966). Posudek oponenta diplomové práce: Ludmila Svobodová-Špánková – Tradice a móda v křestních jménech [Opponent’s assessment of the thesis: Ludmila Svobodová-Špánková – Tradition and fashion in first names]. Zpravodaj Místopisné komise ČSAV [The Bulletin of the Onomastic Committee of the Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences], 7(5), 307.

Sobol, P. (2024). Moravskoslezský kraj je pro lidi zase atraktivní, počet lidí v něm přibývá [The Moravian-Silesian Region is once again attractive to people, and its population is growing]. Patriot. https://www.patriotmagazin.cz/moravskoslezsky-kraj-je-pro-lidi-zase-atraktivni-pocet-lidi-v-nem-pribyva.

Šrámek, R. (1991). První česká socioonomastická práce [The first Czech socio-onomastic work]. Slovo a slovesnost, 52(4), 299–303. http://sas.ujc.cas.cz/archiv.php?art=3431.

Šrámek, R. (2007). Onomastika [Onomastics]. In: Jana Pleskalová – Kapitoly z dějin české jazykovědné bohemistiky [Chapters from the history of Czech linguistics], 377–425. Prague.

Szabo, P. (2024). Obyvatelstvo v Moravskoslezském kraji v roce 2024 [Population in the Moravian-Silesian Region in 2024]. https://csu.gov.cz/msk/obyvatelstvo-v-moravskoslezskem-kraji-v-roce-2024.

Vandebosch, H. (1998). The influence of media on given names. Names, 46(4), 243–262. https://ans-names.pitt.edu/ans/article/view/1530/1529.

Young, R. K., Kennedy, A. H. Newhouse, A., & Browne, P., Thiessen, D. (1993). The effects of names on perception of intelligence, popularity, and competence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23(21), 1770–1788.

Tradice a módy v rodných jménech [Traditions and trends in birth names]. Zpravodaj Místopisné komise ČSAV [The Bulletin of the Onomastic Committee of the Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences]. 1965, 4(6), 183.

Downloads

Published

04/03/2026

How to Cite

KAYSEL MENEGALDO, Kristýna; SIPAVICIUS SEIDE, Márcia; MÍSTECKÝ, Michal. Truly rural? Urban and rural characters of Czech first names as perceived by inhabitants of the Moravian-Silesian Region . Onomastics from Latin America, [S. l.], v. 7, n. 1, p. 1–26, 2026. DOI: 10.48075/odal.v7i1.36638. Disponível em: https://saber.unioeste.br/index.php/onomastica/article/view/36638. Acesso em: 16 jun. 2026.