Nomes próprios na onomástica cognitiva: significado e categorização de nomes próprios
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48075/odal.v4i1.31065Palabras clave:
Onomástica Cognitiva, semântica dos nomes pr´óprios, categorização dos nomes pr´óprios, léxico mental, vocabulário onomásticoResumen
Este artigo teórico fornece uma visão geral sobre como nomes próprios e diferentes tipos de nomes existem no sistema mental, além de propor novas soluções baseadas na perspectiva cognitiva em conexão com antigas questões da teoria do nome. A onomástica cognitiva é uma abordagem relativamente nova para o estudo de nomes próprios baseada em uma abordagem cognitiva da linguagem. Nesse contexto, os nomes como elementos linguísticos são partes do sistema cognitivo, portanto, a representação mental e o uso de nomes próprios podem ser descritos por processos cognitivos gerais. A visão geral dos tópicos e direções da pesquisa onomástica cognitiva mostra que estudar nomes e nomear em uma estrutura cognitiva tem um grande potencial. Ao fornecer mais evidências das vantagens da abordagem cognitiva, este artigo discute duas questões controversas da teoria do nome. Primeiramente, aborda-se o significado dos nomes próprios a partir de uma perspectiva cognitiva, apontando a complexa matriz de significados dessa classe de palavras; em seguida, discute-se a categorização dos nomes próprios, ou seja, como as redes e subredes de nomes emergem no léxico mental.
Citas
Acton, E. K. (2014). Pragmatics and the social meaning of determiners. Doctoral thesis. Manuscript. Stanford University. https://www.emich.edu/english/faculty/documents/suthesisacton.pdf (02. 04.2018.)
Ainiala, T., Saarelma, M. & Sjöblom, P. (2016). Place Names. In Ainiala, T., Saarelma, M. & Sjöblom, P. (Eds.), Names in Focus. An Introduction to Finnish Onomastics, 63-123. Helsinki, SKS.
Aleksieieva, N. (2021). Associative Identification of Proper Names: A Cognitive Approach. WISDOM, 2(18), 194-203. https://doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v18i2.507
Aldrin, E. (2016). Names and Identity. In Hough, C. (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Names and Naming (pp. 382-394). Oxford, Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/ 9780199656431.013.24
Barabás, A., Kálmán C., G. & Nádasdy, Á. (1977). Van-e a magyarban tulajdonnév? [Is there a proper name category in Hungarian?] Nyelvtudományi Közlemények, 79, 135-155.
Berger, D. (1976). Zur Abgrenzung der Eigennamen von den Appellativen. Beiträge zur Namenforschung, 11, 375-387.
Brink, S. (2016). Transferred Names and Analogy in Name-formation. In Hough, C. (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Names and Naming (158-166). Oxford, Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199656431.001.0001
Brozović Rončević, D. & Žic Fuchs, M. (2005). Metaphorical processes as the basis of proper names. Quaderni Internazionali di Rivista italiana di onomastica: RIOn International Series, 1, 33-44.
Bybee, J. (1998). The Emergent Lexicon. CLS 34: The Panels, 421-435.
Bybee, J. (2006). Frequency of Use and the Organization of Language. Oxford, Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195301571.001.0001
Bybee, J. (2010). Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511750526
Coates, R. (2012). Eight issues in the pragmatic theory of properhood. Acta Linguistica Lithuanica, 66, 119-140.
Croft, W. (2001). Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford, Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.27.3.10san
De Stefani, E. (2016). Names and Discourse. In Hough, C. (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Names and Naming (pp. 52-66). Oxford, Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199656431.013.48
Dobrić, N. (2010). Theory of Names and Cognitive Linguistics — the Case of the Metaphor. Filozofija i drustvo, 2010(1), 135-147. https://doi.org/10.2298/FID1001135D
Fabre, P. (1980). Théorie du nom propre et recherche onomastique. Cahiers de praxématique : Théories et fonctionnements du nom propre, 8, 9-25. https://doi.org/10.4000/praxematique.1383
Forgács, J. (1999), A társas érintkezés pszichológiája [The Psychology of Social Interactions]. Budapest, Kairosz Kiadó.
Gardner, H. (1992). Dem Denken auf der Spur. Der Weg der Kognitionswissenschaft. Stuttgart, Klett-Cotta.
Głaz, A. (2017). The linguistic sign: Metonymy and virtuality. Linguistik Online, 80(1). https://doi.org/10.13092/lo.80.3565
Győrffy, E. (2018). Helynév-szociológia [Place name sociology]. Debrecen, Debreceni Egyetemi Kiadó.
Hansack, E. (2004). Das Wesen des Namens. In: Brendler, A. & Brendler, S. (Eds.), Namenarten und ihre Erforschung. Ein Lehrbuch für das Studium der Onomastik (pp. 51-65). Hamburg, Baar.
Heinrich, A. (2000). Szaniszló helynevei kognitív nyelvészeti megközelítésben [Place names of Szaniszló from a cognitive approach]. MA thesis. Manuscript. Kolozsvár.
Hillenbrand, P. et al. (2013). Better branding: brand names can influence consumer choice. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 22, 300-308. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-04-2012-0120
Hilpert, M. (2015). Historical linguistics. In Dąbrowska, E. & Divjak, D. (Eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 346-366). Berlin, De Gruyter Mouton.
Hoffmann, I. (2007). Helynevek nyelvi elemzése [The linguistic analysis of place names]. Budapest, Tinta Könyvkiadó.
Jespersen, O. (1924/1992). The Philosophy of Grammar. Chicago & London, University of Chicago Press.
Jonasson, K. (1994). Le nom propre. Construction et interpretations. Louvain-la-Neuve, Duculot.
Karpenko, E. (2006). Когнітивна ономастика як напрямок пізнання власних назв. [Cognitive onomastics as a direction of proper names cognition, in Ukrainian]. Doctoral thesis. Manusript. Одеса. http://karpenko.in.ua/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/disser-key.pdf (01.09.2022.)
Kiviniemi, E. (1975). Paikanniemien rakennetyypeistä [On structural types of place-names]. Suomi 118. Helsinki, Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura.
Kövecses, Z. (2018). Metonymy: A New Look. In Kövecses, Z., Ten Lectures on Figurative Meaning-Making: The Role of Body and Context (pp. 66-75). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004364905_007
Kripke, S. A. (1972). Naming and necessity. In Davidson, D. & Harman, G. (Eds.), Semantics of natural language (pp. 253-355). Boston, D. Reidel.
Lakoff, G. &Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University Chicago Press, Chicago.
F. Láncz, É. (2011). A tulajdonságra utaló családnevek kognitív nyelvészeti megközelítésben [Surnames referring to characteristics from a cognitive approach]. Névtani Értesítő, 33, 29-38.
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundation of cognitive grammar 1. Stanford, California, Stanford University Press.
Langacker, R. W. (1991). Foundation of cognitive grammar 2. Stanford, California, Stanford University Press.
Langacker, R. W. (2008). Cognitive Grammar. A Basic Introduction. Oxford, Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001
Leino, A. (2006). Place-names as constructions. Onoma, 41, 215-235.
Leino, A. (2007). Construction Grammar in onomastics: the case of Finnish hydronyms. In Bremer, D., Bani, M., Belli, F. & Paolini, M. (Eds.), I Nomi Nel Tempo e Nello Spazio- Atti del XXII Congresso Internazionale di Scienze Onomastische. Pisa, 28 agosto-4 settembre 2005. 1 (pp. 297-309). Pisa, Edizioni ETS.
Lieven, E. (2016). Usage-based approaches to language development: Where do we go from here? Language and Cognition, 8, 346-368. https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2016.16
Lőrincze, L. (1947). Földrajzineveink élete [Life of geographical names]. Budapest, Teleki Pál Tudományos Intézet Néptudományi Intézete.
Markert, K. & Nissim, M. (2006). Metonymic Proper Names: A Corpusbased Account. In Stefanowitsch, A. & Gries S. Th. (Eds.), Corpus-Based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy (pp. 152-174). Berlin, De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199895.152.
Markey, T. L. (1982). Crisis and Cognition in Onomastics. Names, 30(3), 129-142.
von Mengden, F. & Coussé, E. (2014). The role of change in usage-based conceptions of language. In Coussé, E. & von Mengden, F. (Eds.), Usage-based approaches to language change (pp. 1-19). Amsterdam, Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/sfsl.69.01men
Miklósi, Á. (2005). Szociális kogníció: neurális alapok, plaszticitás és evolúció [Social cognition: neural bases, plasticity and evolution]. Magyar Tudomány, 2005, 53-63.
Mill, J. S. (1872). System of Logic: ratiocinative and inductive. Eighth edition. London, Longmans, Green, Reader and Dyer.
Miller, G. A. (2003). The cognitive revolution: a historical perspective. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 7(3), 141-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00029-9
Nicolaisen, W. F. H. (1978). Are there Connotative Names? Names, 26, 40-47.
Novikova, O. N. (2018). Потенциал взаимодействия ономастики с нейронауками. [Potential for interaction of onomastics with neurosciences] Philological Sciences. Issues of Theory and Practice. Грамота 5(2), 371-374.
Nübling, D. (2017). The growing distance between proper names and common nouns in German: On the way to onymicschema constancy. Folia Linguistica, 51 (2), 341-367. https://doi.org/10.1515/flin-2017-0012
Nyström, S. (2016). Names and Meaning. In Hough, C. (Ed.), The Oxford Hand¬book of Names and Naming (pp. 39-51). Oxford, Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/ oxfordhb/9780199656431.013.26
Onchoke, A. S. (2018). A Cognitive Linguistics Study of Ekegusii Onomastics: The Case of the Metaphor. Linguistics and Literature Studies, 6(2), 88-98. https://doi.org/10.13189/lls.2018.060206
Pütz, M., Robinson, J. A. & Reif, M. (Eds.) (2014). Cognitive Sociolinguistics. Social and cultural variation in cognition and language use. John Benjamins.
Rachut, K. (2021). The cognitive aspects of literary communication and literary proper names: a theoretical framework for literary proprial concepts. HETEROGLOSSIA. Studia kulturoznawczo-filologiczne, 11, 151-164.
Reszegi, K. (2016). The Acquisition of Place Names in Mother Tongue Learning: Some Observations on Children’s Spatial Cognition. Voprosy onomastiki, 13(2), 7-22. https://doi.org/10.15826/vopr_onom.2016.13.2.015
Reszegi, K. (2018a). A nevek jelentésszerkezete (funkcionális kognitív keretben). [The meaning structure of names using a functional cognitive approach] Magyar Nyelvjárások, 56, 5-23. https://doi.org/10.30790/mnyj/2018/01
Reszegi, K. (2018b). Mental Aspects of Proper Names. Onomastica Uralica, 10, 149-167.
Reszegi, K. (2018c). On the proper-name-to-appellative transformation. Rivista Italiana di Onomastica, 24, 25-46.
Reszegi, K. (2019). A névformánssal való névalkotás (kognitív nyelvészeti keretben). [Name giving using name formant: a cognitive linguistic analysis] Magyar Nyelvjárások, 57, 31-50. https://doi.org/10.30790/mnyj/2019/02
Reszegi, K. (2020). Toponyms and Spatial Representations. Onomastica, 64, 23-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.17651/ONOMAST.64.4
Reszegi, K. (2021). The Mental and Neural Representation of Names: A Cognitive and Economic Point of View. In Leibring, K. et al. (Eds.), The Economy in Names: Values, Branding and Globalization, 119-132. Uppsala, Department of Archives and Research, Uppsala, Institute for Language and Folklore.
Reszegi, K. (2022a). Metonymic name giving from a cognitive perspective. Acta Onomastica, 63(1), 206-225.
Reszegi, K. (2022b). A cognitive approach in onomastics: some notes on metaphorical place names. Voprosy Onomastiki, 19(1), 235-244. https://doi.org/10.15826/vopr_onom.2022.19.1.012
Reszegi, K. (2022c). Kognitív szemléletű névtudományi vizsgálatok. [Cognitive approach in onomastics] Debrecen, Debreceni Egyetemi Kiadó.
Reszegi, K. & Kenyhercz, R. (2023). A cognitive linguistic study of descriptions of borders in medieval charters. In print.
Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In Rosch, E. & Lloyd, B. B. (Eds.), Cognition and Categorization (pp. 27-48). New York, Halsted Press.
Sándor, K. (1999). Szociolingvisztikai alapismeretek. [Introduction to sociolinguistics] In Galgóczi, L. (Ed.), Nyelvtan, nyelvhasználat, kommunikáció, 135-171. Szeged, JGYTF Kiadó.
Shulska, N., Hromyk, Y. & Yavorskyi, A. (2018). The cognitive nature of Ukrainian nickname construction. Cognitive Studies, 18, Article 1544. https://doi.org/10.11649/cs.1544
Sjöblom, P. (2006). A cognitive approach to the semantics of proper nouns. Onoma, 41, 63-82.
Slíz, M. (2008a). Kognitív történeti névtan? A családnevek kialakulásának kérdése kognitív szemantikai keretben. [Cognitive historical onomastics? Cognitive semantic analysis of the formation of surnames] In Kuna, Á. & Veszelszki, Á. (Eds.), Az ELTE Nyelvtudományi Doktori Iskola 3. Félúton Konferenciájának előadásai (pp. 228-241). Budapest.
Slíz, M. (2008b). Melyiket a négy közül? A családnevek kialakulásának kérdése kognitív szemantikai keretben. [Which one of the four? Cognitive semantic analysis of the formation of surnames] In Bölcskei, A. & N. Császi, I. (Eds.), Név és valóság. A VI. Magyar Névtudományi Konferencia eladásai (pp. 468-474). Budapest.
Slíz, M. (2012). Tulajdonnév és kategorizáció. [Proper name and categorization] Magyar Nyelv, 108, 282-291, 400-410.
J. Soltész, K. (1979). A tulajdonnév funkciója és jelentése. [The function and meaning of proper names] Budapest, Akadémiai Kiadó.
Szilágyi N., S. (1996). Hogyan teremtsünk világot? Rávezetés a nyelvi világ vizsgálatára. [How to create world? Introduction to the study of linguistic world] Kolozsvár, Erdélyi Tankönyvtanács.
Szilágyi N. S. (2006). A jelentésvilág szerkezete. [The structure of meaning] In Hitseker, M. & Szilágyi, Z. (Eds.), Mindentudás Egyeteme 5 (pp. 213-237). Budapest, Kossuth Kiadó.
Taylor, J. R. (2002). Cognitive Grammar. Oxford University Press.
Tolcsvai Nagy, G. (2008). A tulajdonnév jelentése. [Meaning of proper name] In Bölcskei, A. & N. Császi, I. (Eds.), Név és valóság. A VI. Magyar Névtudományi Konferencia eladásai, 30-41. Budapest.
Tomasello, M. (2009). The Usage-based theory of language acquisition. In Bavin, E. L. (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Child Language,69-87. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316095829.005
Valentine, T., Brennen, T. & Brédart, S. (1996). The Cognitive Psychology of Proper Names. On the importance of being Ernest. London-New York, Routledge.
Van Langendonck, W. (2007). Theory and Typology of Proper Names. Berlin-New York, De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197853
Van Langendonck, W. (2013). A Semantic-Pragmatic Theory of Proper Names. Acta Linguistica Lithuanica, 69, 99-129.
Yee, E. (2017). Fluid semantics: Semantic knowledge is experience-based and dynamic. In Lahiri, A. & Kotzor, S. (Eds.), The Speech Processing Lexicon: Neurocognitive and Behavioural Approaches,236-255. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110422658-012.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2023 Katalin Reszegi
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0.
Aviso de derechos de autor de Creative Commons
Política de revistas de acceso abierto
Los autores que publican en esta revista aceptan los siguientes términos:
1. Los autores conservan los derechos de autor y otorgan a la revista el derecho de primera publicación, con el trabajo licenciado simultáneamente bajo la Creative Commons Attribution License que permite compartir el trabajo con reconocimiento de autoría y publicación inicial en esta revista.
2. Autoridades obligatorias para asumir compromisos, para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión del trabajo publicado en esta revista (ej. Publicar en un repositorio institucional o como capítulo de un libro), con reconocimiento de autoría y publicación inicial en esta revista.
3. Se permite y se anima a los autores a publicar y distribuir su trabajo en línea (por ejemplo, en repositorios institucionales o en la página personal) en cualquier momento antes o durante el proceso editorial, ya que esto puede generar cambios productivos así como incrementar el impacto y la citación del trabajo publicado (Ver El efecto del acceso abierto).
Licencia Creative Commons
Este trabajo tiene la licencia de Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, que permite compartir, copiar, distribuir, mostrar, reproducir, un todo o partes, siempre que no tenga un propósito comercial y sea citado por los autores y una fuente.
